U.S. officials: "Cyber Warfare Is Already Here"
U.S. officials say China, Russia, and possibly other nation-states are capable of collecting or exploiting data held on U.S. information systems; Director of National Intelligence says especially worrisome is the ability of other countries to destroy data in the system: “And the destroying data could be something like money supply, electric power distribution, transportation sequencing and that sort of thing”
Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England is but the latest government official to express concern about the U.S. cyberspace vulnerabilities. “Cyber warfare is already here,” said England. “It’s one of our major challenges.” Describing the new battlefront, the deputy secretary said, “I think cyber attacks are probably analogous to the first time, way back when people had bows and arrows and spears, and somebody showed up with gunpowder and everybody said, ‘Wow. What was that?’” John Kruzel of the
American Forces Press Service writes that England, speaking on 3 March to a Veterans of Foreign Wars conference, noted that President Bush addressed the threat by establishing a task force to coordinate U.S. government efforts to safeguard computers against cyber attacks. In addition, the United States and other NATO allies are expected to address the issue of cyber defense when the 20th NATO summit convenes in Bucharest, Romania, in early April.
Estonia, a NATO member, was victimized by a series of data-flooding attacks last year that brought down the Web sites of several daily newspapers and forced Estonia’s largest bank to shut down its online banking network. “Estonia happens to be very advanced, in terms of networks in their country,” England said. “So a strength was turned into a vulnerability.” Last week, the Pentagon’s top intelligence official today told a Senate committee that cyber threats are contributing to the “unusually complex” security environment the United States faces. “A global military trend of concern is … the sophisticated ability of select nations and non-state groups to exploit and perhaps target for attack our computer networks,” Army Lt. Gen. Michael Maples, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told the Senate Armed Services Committee on 27 February. Joining the Pentagon’s top intelligence official at the hearing on current and future threats facing the United States was the director of national intelligence, retired Navy Vice Adm. John “Mike” McConnell. Asked by senators about cyber threats, Admiral McConnell said, “We’re not prepared to deal with it. The United States information infrastructure, including telecommunications and computer networks and systems, and most importantly the data that reside on these systems is critical to virtually every aspect of our modern life,” he continued. “Threats to our intelligence infrastructure are an important focus of this community.”
Admiral McConnell said China, Russia, and possibly other nation-states have been assessed as being capable of collecting or exploiting data held on U.S. information systems. “The threat that also concerns us a great deal, and maybe even more so, is if someone has the ability to enter information in systems, they can destroy data,” he said. “And the destroying data could be something like money supply, electric power distribution, transportation sequencing and that sort of thing.” Elsewhere on Capitol Hill last week, Michael Vickers, assistant secretary of defense for special operations, low-intensity conflict, and interdependent capabilities, appeared before the Strategic Force Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee on 27 February. “In the area of cyberspace, both nation states and non-state actors continued to seek ways and means to counter the advantages we obtain from our use of information and to turn those same advantages against us in both conventional and unconventional ways,” he said. Vickers said the Defense Department is working closely with interagency partners to scope future missions, address the partners’ respective roles and to determine how best to face potential adversaries’ attempts to counter our information advantages. “We are making progress,” he said, “but much remains to be done.”